Notes

In reply to this conservation:
Why couldn’t Microsoft and Google talk to each other. Now we’ve got MS share contracts vs. Web Intents. Puppies are crying guys! #ndcoslo – Remy Sharp on twitter

@rem That's nothing Mozilla have just re-framed Web Activities as a 'counter-proposal' to Web Intents. Make me cry never mind the puppies.

‐ Also on:

A technical comparison Web Activities vs Web Intents core features - http://bit.ly/K8JdSc

‐ Also on:

Its great to see Mozilla pushing forward lots of areas that interest me in the WebAPI work http://mzl.la/r05Gpz Contacts/Web Activities

‐ Also on:

Coding a OAuth request in JavaScript, can never remember which round the access token and the request token are

‐ Also on:

"Web Apps that are of the web are not a think of the past" nice quote from @danwrong at end this interview http://youtu.be/EzpHeMUBX70 #urls

‐ Also on:
In reply to this conservation:
@glennjones Hi, you're the pro, rel=me is a two way relationship, is that exclusively with G+ or can I integrate with FB & Twitter? – AndyM on twitter

@AndyM23 at the moment I think only Google use rel=me to claim authorship, but add it to any links between two profiles for one person

‐ Also on:

Great article on HyperCard, the beginning my interest in interactive design, is it really 25 years old http://bit.ly/LL0ALq - one for @t

‐ Also on:

Glad we spent loads of time looking at the impacts of the EU cookie law for ICO to change its advice 48hrs before the law came into force...

‐ Also on:

Looks like there is movement on Mozilla's Web Activities API http://bit.ly/LwJRYV

‐ Also on:

CirusCirus what a crap bar with worthless staff. Complained and manager started to moan about just coming of his break

‐ Also on:

Page: 79 of 241

previous

more

Page created: